Syracuse, Utah Title X, Chickens

Wednesday, 6 February 2008 14:48 by joelevi

Last night my wife and P~ and I went to the Syracuse Planning Commission Meeting where (amongst other things) modification to Title X (that's "Title Ten" or "Title 10" to all you non-Romans out there), which outlines land usage in the city. What we were interested in was the clarification of whether or not chickens (hens, specifically) are allowed as "household pets." According to our Ordinance Secretary, so long as you don't have a rooster, and you obtain the "fowl" from a "State Licensed Pet Store" you're okay to have up to two hens -- but the wording is very confusing.

So, last night our Planning Commission Chairman introduced a modification to the Title that would allow up to 5 hens and/or rabbits and would do away with the "State Licensed Pet Store" requirement. The number of birds was debated a little amongst the commissioners, but none seemed opposed to the idea.

So, next the modified Title X (which isn't available online anywhere at the time of this writing) will be brought up for public comment on 3/4/2008. I would like "hens" or "chickens" replaced with "Egg Bearing Small Fowl" (which could include chickens and ducks, and exclude roosters), and I'd like the number to stay at 5 birds (which would give you 4 laying hens and one "dominant hen"; always subtract 1 from the number of hens if no rooster is present to give you the number of laying hens). 4 laying hens would provide a little less than two dozen eggs per week (depending on variety and conditions, of course), which should be enough eggs to supply a suburban family.

I'll be leaving the state on business the night of the 4th, so I'll most likely miss this meeting, but I'll prepare a document to be read on my behalf.


If you liked this post, please be sure to subscribe to my RSS Feed.

Digg It!DZone It!StumbleUponTechnoratiRedditDel.icio.usNewsVineFurlBlinkList

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Related posts

Comments

February 18. 2008 04:16

charles treutlein

I recently read your article on Utah title 10. and when do you think they might modify this rule. Also i have a question for you what are the laws on keeping cotournix quail and the sale of their eggs? Or where can i get some information on this?

charles treutlein

February 18. 2008 11:58

joelevi

@charles treutlein:

The first thing to clarify is that my posts is specific to Syracuse, Utah (not Utah in general); if you're not a Syracuse resident this post may not apply to you.

Secondly, the section in Title X that we're talking about (as I understand it) only limits animals residential zones (if you're zoned agricultural, you're most likely okay).

Thirdly, there is a clause in there is a clause in the Syracuse Title X as it applies to residentially zoned properties that specifically states that one cannot raise fowl for commercial purposes (i.e., selling the birds or the eggs).

Fourthly, under the current Title X, so long as you purchase your quail from a "State Licensed Pet Store" and have no more than two, you should be fine under the Household Pets provision of the Title.

Lastly, on March 4th, 2008, the Planning Commission is holding the "Public Comment phase" of the proposed revisions to Title X. The present proposal says you can keep up to 5 chickens. I'd recommend that you show up for the public comment and request it be changed from "chickens" to "small fowl" (which would allow chickens, ducks, quail, and other small birds).

Hope to see you there!

- www.JoeLevi.com

joelevi

February 29. 2008 14:24

chuck

where is this meeting going to be at?

chuck

Comments are closed